Miguel Câmara
- Authorized Reseller
- Total activity 275
- Last activity
- Member since
- Following 1 user
- Followed by 0 users
- Votes 101
- Subscriptions 89
Activity overview
Latest activity by Miguel Câmara-
Miguel Câmara created a post,
Alarm Layouts on Mult-Screen Workstations
How can we control which screen/instance of Nx will the Alarm Layout open?I am not sure what is the actual behavior of this, but in my test scenario, I opened Nx and then opened a New Window of Nx ...
-
Miguel Câmara commented,
Hi,Thank you for bringing this uo, I agree and already upvoted this request.We've only had one solution in the past with this feature, but has come up again and again on customer meetings and demon...
-
Miguel Câmara created a post,
Add field to Lookup Lists
Hi,When creating a list of authroized license plates, for example, we should be able to add a custom value for a description or name of the person.This way, whenever the plate is recognized and boo...
-
Miguel Câmara created a post,
Playback access limitation by time or bookmark
(Please click on that up arrow if you agree with this feature request)NxWitness applications in big installations require that a user can be limited on what footage he can actually access, for priv...
-
Miguel Câmara commented,
Hi,Although I am not part of the Network Optix Team, let me try to clarify based on my understanding and experience.Are new recordings stored exclusively on the failover server?Do existing recordin...
-
Miguel Câmara commented,
Hello Dinh Ngoc Hien,Your description of the behavior feels like something I had about 2 months ago, where for some reason my System was "out of sync" (not sure if that's the right description, but...
-
Miguel Câmara commented,
Hi,I have already upvoted this request.I really wish Nx would see how much this way is required by most of the partners.I honestly have no way of justifying “Why” it works the way it does at the mo...
-
Miguel Câmara commented,
Hi Nathan,I am pretty sure that licensing is not the issue.I have upvoted this post, but would also like to comment that I also have this issue sometimes, without a clear explanation why it happens...
-
Miguel Câmara commented,
I know what you mean, but the request comes from an end-user / Integrator where they already have 15 servers (and growing) and they would want this.This is a “High Availability” kind of application...
-
Miguel Câmara created a post,
Staggered/Sequential server upgrade
I don't think this is possible yet, but it would be interesting to be able to selectively apply upgrades to specific servers, so that there is a not a System Wide sync'ed recording gap in all camer...